All setups › AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) › The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen)

Best The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) settings for the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) (2026)

On a AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) (paired with a balanced Intel Core i5-8600K-class CPU), The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) runs at roughly 61 FPS at 1080p with our optimized settings — up from about 24FPS with everything maxed. Here's the configuration and what each setting costs.

The AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) is a entry-level graphics card with 4GB of VRAM, and The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) is a demanding, graphically heavy game. Paired with the Intel Core i5-8600K, it runs well at 1080p — about 61 FPS with FrameCoach's optimized settings, a clear jump from roughly 24 FPS with everything on High.

Across resolutions you can expect around 61 FPS at 1080p and 40 FPS at 1440p, dropping to roughly 22 FPS at 4K. The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) offers ray tracing, but the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) isn't built for it, so we leave it off. The biggest free win is FSR upscaling — set it to Quality for a large FPS boost at little visual cost.

ResolutionAll-High FPSOptimized FPS
1080p2461
1440p1440
4K822
🚀 Biggest free win: enable FSR (Balanced) — about +55% FPS for a small sharpness trade.
Recommended settings
Upscaling — FSRBalanced+55% FPS
The Next-Gen update adds DLSS, FSR and XeSS. A big GPU-side boost, especially with ray tracing on.
Ray Tracing (GI / Reflections / Shadows)Offsaves FPS
Ray-traced global illumination and reflections — beautiful but very heavy. Turn Off for big FPS; pair with upscaling if you want it.
Foliage Visibility RangeLow+10% FPS
How far grass and bushes render — a real cost in the open world. High is a great trade.
Shadow QualityLow+8% FPS
Shadow resolution and range. High looks nearly identical to Ultra.
Detail LevelLow+6% FPS
Overall world geometry detail and draw distance.
Ambient Occlusion (HBAO+)Off+5% FPS
Contact shadows for depth. SSAO is a cheaper alternative to HBAO+.
Number of Background CharactersLow+5% FPS
How many NPCs fill towns like Novigrad — a CPU lever in crowded cities.
Light ShaftsOff+4% FPS
God-rays through trees and windows. Cheap; nice atmosphere.
Anti-AliasingOff+4% FPS
Edge smoothing. Cheap; leave it On unless you want a sharper image.
Grass DensityMedium+3% FPS
How thick the grass is. Lowering is an easy saving in fields.
Terrain QualityMedium+2% FPS
Ground geometry and tessellation detail. High looks great and runs well.
Water QualityMedium+2% FPS
Water detail and reflections. Modest cost.
Motion Blur / DoF / BloomOff+2% FPS
Post-processing effects bundle. Nearly free; pure preference.
Texture QualityUltra-1% FPS
Surface sharpness — cheap if it fits your VRAM. Keep it Ultra on 8GB+ cards.
NVIDIA HairWorksOffbaseline
Physically simulated hair and fur. Surprisingly costly (especially on monsters) — most players leave it Off or Geralt-only.
Anisotropic Filtering16xbaseline
Keeps the ground sharp into the distance — essentially free, use 16x.

⚡ Fine-tune this for your exact CPU & target FPS →

🎯 Can the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) run The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen)? See the verdict →

The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) on other GPUs
Other games on the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU)
Frequently asked

What FPS does the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) get in The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen)?

With FrameCoach's optimized balanced settings, the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) averages around 61 FPS at 1080p in The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) — up from about 24 FPS with everything on High.

Can the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) run The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) at 1440p?

At 1440p with optimized settings, the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU) averages roughly 40 FPS in The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen); turn on upscaling or aim for a locked 60 for the best feel.

What are the best The Witcher 3 (Next-Gen) settings for the AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 iGPU)?

Turn on FSR (Balanced), keep ray tracing off for maximum FPS, and ease the heaviest options like Foliage Visibility Range and Shadow Quality down a notch. The full per-setting breakdown is above.

FPS figures are estimates from a generalized model (hardware tier × game load × per-setting weights), not live benchmarks — real performance varies by scene, drivers and game version.