The AMD RX 6700 XT is a strong 1440p card and the NVIDIA RTX 4060 is a mainstream 1080p card. Across popular games at 1080p with FrameCoach's optimized settings, the AMD RX 6700 XT averages about NaN FPS versus NaN FPS for the NVIDIA RTX 4060 — roughly 13% more performance.
| AMD RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA RTX 4060 | |
|---|---|---|
| Relative performance | 113% | 100% (baseline) |
| VRAM | 12GB | 8GB |
| Ray tracing | Yes | Yes |
| Upscaling | FSR | DLSS |
| Tier | strong 1440p | mainstream 1080p |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | NaN FPS | NaN FPS |
Estimated frame rates with optimized balanced settings, both cards on a AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-class CPU.
| Game | AMD RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA RTX 4060 |
|---|
For most gamers, the AMD RX 6700 XT is the better performer of the two — about 13% faster, which translates to a noticeable but smaller bump in demanding games. The AMD RX 6700 XT also carries more VRAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps at higher resolutions and with high-res textures. If you already own the NVIDIA RTX 4060, the gap to the AMD RX 6700 XT is small enough that an upgrade is hard to justify on performance alone.
⚡ Tune either GPU for your exact CPU & target FPS in the optimizer →
Yes. The AMD RX 6700 XT is about 13% faster overall, averaging roughly NaN FPS versus NaN FPS for the NVIDIA RTX 4060 at 1080p with optimized settings across popular games.
About 13% faster on average. The exact gap varies by game and resolution — heavier, GPU-bound games show the biggest difference.
A 13% jump is a small step up — usually not worth the cost on its own. The AMD RX 6700 XT also carries more VRAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps at higher resolutions and with high-res textures.
FPS figures are estimates from a generalized model (hardware tier × game load × per-setting weights), not live benchmarks — real performance varies by scene, drivers and game version.