The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti is a strong 1440p card and the AMD RX 6700 XT is a strong 1440p card. Across popular games at 1440p with FrameCoach's optimized settings, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti averages about NaN FPS versus NaN FPS for the AMD RX 6700 XT — roughly 5% more performance.
| NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti | AMD RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
| Relative performance | 105% | 100% (baseline) |
| VRAM | 8GB | 12GB |
| Ray tracing | Yes | Yes |
| Upscaling | DLSS | FSR |
| Tier | strong 1440p | strong 1440p |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | NaN FPS | NaN FPS |
Estimated frame rates with optimized balanced settings, both cards on a AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-class CPU.
| Game | NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti | AMD RX 6700 XT |
|---|
For most gamers, the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti is the better performer of the two — about 5% faster, which translates to a noticeable but smaller bump in demanding games. Interestingly, the slower AMD RX 6700 XT actually has more VRAM (12GB vs 8GB) — a small edge for very high-res textures, though it can't close the raw performance gap. If you already own the AMD RX 6700 XT, the gap to the NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti is small enough that an upgrade is hard to justify on performance alone.
⚡ Tune either GPU for your exact CPU & target FPS in the optimizer →
Yes. The NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti is about 5% faster overall, averaging roughly NaN FPS versus NaN FPS for the AMD RX 6700 XT at 1440p with optimized settings across popular games.
About 5% faster on average. The exact gap varies by game and resolution — heavier, GPU-bound games show the biggest difference.
A 5% jump is a small step up — usually not worth the cost on its own. Interestingly, the slower AMD RX 6700 XT actually has more VRAM (12GB vs 8GB) — a small edge for very high-res textures, though it can't close the raw performance gap.
FPS figures are estimates from a generalized model (hardware tier × game load × per-setting weights), not live benchmarks — real performance varies by scene, drivers and game version.